Who should beg whom?

 

 

 

Begin forwarded message:





From: Piotr Bein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Date: 12 March 2007 21:59:09 GMT

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Subject: Who should beg whom?

 

http://byzantinesacredart.com/blog/2006/11/european-serbia.html

Freedom-Loving Serbs Do Not Seek Admission to Autocratic Clubs

by John Bosnitch, Tokyo

posted 26.11.206

(A letter to a student who had to respond to the question "What has Serbia
contributed to the world that would give reason for them to be permitted to
become a member of the European Union?")

The blog's owner, Svetlana Novko of Vancouver, Canada, commented: 

"to date, the most thorough and the most educated snapshot of the world
history and the role of Serbia in it that I have had the pleasure to read"

EXCERPT:

============================================

[...]

European Union Grown Out of the Rivalry of German Tribes

Which brings me to my advice as to what you should write in your report to
your teacher....

[...] The question was:

What has Serbia contributed to the world that would give reason for them to
be permitted to become a member of the European Union?

So let's dissect this nonsense question. Since when was a "contribution to
the world" a condition for EU membership? (Was Germany's world contribution
the Holocaust? And was Spain's the Inquisition -- or was it its wanton rape
and pillage of the New World?) Since when should we Serbs, at the heart of
Europe, need permission from anyone to be European? (Remember all that
opportunistic Western propaganda about Sarajevo being the very heart of
Europe -- well, let's flip it back at them.) And then let's ask what
authority the EU had in international law to appropriate for its currency
the name "euro" without automatically allowing all Europeans right up the
Ural mountains the right to call it their own. They certainly have no trade
mark on the word Europe -- it belongs to all of us. So, the EU is obviously
not synonymous with Europe. Which means that we need to define what, in
fact, it is...

If you search a little bit, it won't take you long to find that the EU grew
out of an economic alliance between the ruling capitalists of Germany and
France to end their hundreds of years of civil war. Why do I use the term
"civil war" to describe World War I and World War II and the many
France-Germany wars before that? Because all of them were based on the
rivalry between two groups of Germans; those who stayed in Germany and the
Franks (a German tribe) who left Germany to drive West and subjugate the
Gauls (who lived in the old Roman province of Gaul that has since been
renamed "France" in honor of its German conquerors). The Germans on both
sides of Alsace-Lorraine then fought over that territory for centuries after
King Lothair, one of three German descendants of Karol, died without a
successor and his cousins to the east in Germany and to the west in France
could not agree on who should get his kingdom... (Lothair's kingdom =
Lothair's regnum (Latin) = Lorraine).

German Saddle Doesn't Fit on Serbian Back

Many millions of deaths later, these two groups of Germanic peoples decided
to stop massacring each other and build a common market based on cooperation
first in steel development and production, later in other areas and finally
in the form of the EU. The French ruling elites revealed their true roots by
submitting largely to German leadership and we now have a new Europe ruled
primarily by Germans who have enticed other nations to join through economic
incentives -- bribery if you like. For many, the financial offer is more
important than anything else -- after all, these are nations that have all
been ruled by foreign, German kings for most of their history, so the saddle
still fits nicely on their backs.

But Serbia is different. We have never submitted to the German-dominated
systems -- neither Hitler's, nor the Kaiser's, nor Bismark's, nor the
Austrian German variants before that. We have grown to love freedom more
than money, or at least that has been our character until now.

Joining the German-Led Europe Involves Surrender of Sovereignty

And so we face a historic challenge. Shall we finally join the German-led
Europe after all these battles for our freedom?

If it were merely a free-trade deal like NAFTA (the North American Free
Trade Agreement) the loss of sovereignty would be limited and Serbia would
remain an independent state. But that is not what the EU represents. Instead
the EU represents an effort of the ruling classes of each member state to
form a common union in which the economic reward is merely a bribe in search
of the surrender of sovereignty -- which is their trophy. With national
independence snuffed out, the EU ruling elites will eventually operate the
place as a single country, ruled mainly from Berlin and the European central
bank in Frankfurt. It will have its own army and all the member states will
have to send troops to participate in its "adventures." In Afghanistan, in
Iraq, in Sudan, and maybe even in Russia, young Serb men would be in arms,
extending Western-style "freedom," the essence of [Roman] Catholicism and
"human rights" to our brother Slavs at the end of a rifle barrel.

The costs sound bad, so what about the benefits? Well, being at the far end
of the new German empire, instead of seeing things flow our way, we would
certainly see all of our best and brightest youth heading to the center of
European power in flows so great that they would dwarf the past flows of
Yugoslav gastarbeiters (guest workers) into Germany, the brain drain that we
have seen during or since these latest Balkan wars, and certainly the period
of forced indoctrination of Serb youths in Ottoman Turkey as kidnapped
janissaries.

Most of the main economic activity in the EU is based in the center of the
EU -- in Germany and France. They make the AirBus planes and Mercedes cars
-- we might be "permitted" to make some tires for each of them. Our
free-for-all agricultural industry will be totally mechanized and the
early-morning markets in the piazzas (public squares) will be replaced by
sterile supermarkets full of frozen foods -- have you ever tasted a tomato
anywhere in the EU (or even America) that tastes as good as a fresh tomato
from an open market in Serbia? No, I did not think so.

As a sign of things to come, as soon as the pro-EU opposition seized power
in their October 2000 coup in Serbia there were hundreds of truckloads
(hundreds of thousands of tons) of genetically modified soy beans (unwanted
anywhere else) being dumped into northern Vojvodina as the first doors
opened to "superior" Western and EU goods. Since then, German investors have
bought up most of the privatized Serbian industries, and even the media.
Today, Germans own the main newspapers that Serbs read in Belgrade. Entry to
the EU will make the surrender of Serbia's independence and the collapse of
national self-sufficiency even more complete.

And all trade, not just agriculture, will be regulated by the most massive
and inhuman bureaucracy ever seen... a bureaucracy based not in Serbia but
in faraway Brussels. For more reasons to stay out of the EU, check the web
site of the United Kingdom Independence Party (it is very interesting to
hear people talking this way from INSIDE the European Union).

Serbia Should Stay Out of the EU

So in fact, your teacher's question should not have been the misleading one
that you received. Countries entering the EU are not judged on their world
contributions, but instead on their level of servitude and willingness to be
ruled from abroad in return for some small change. One day, the EU might
become a better thing, after this model collapses, and it might be replaced
by a real free-trade zone without the loss of national freedoms. That might
be something to consider. But for now, Serbia's best bet is to stay out,
raise financing independently (perhaps from the booming economies over here
in Asia, where I have lived for years) and build a vibrant economy that
serves the interests of the Serbian people before all else. With that goal
achieved, we could wait for the inevitable gold-embossed invitation from the
EU or its likely successor organization and negotiate whatever we like from
a position of strength rather than from our knees as beggars.

Don't let the wrong question confuse you... no matter how many Teslas or
Pupins or raspberries, soccer championships, or guerrillas wars of
resistance, or anything else we can claim, the only thing that counts is our
willingness to submit, be ruled and smile at the thought of it. Serbia is
the richest country in the Balkans. It sits on the crossroads of land and
water transport to the east and the south. We can name our price for
anything we are asked to do for Europe. But if Serbia is thrown open to the
EU now, before we can compete properly, it would only be because our current
rulers hope to skim a nice percentage for themselves, personally.

Let's stay in step with people like the British UKIP (Independence Party),
Switzerland, and Iceland... people who know the difference between a con and
a good deal.

[...]

 

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Одговори путем е-поште