http://www.b92.net/eng/news/politics-article.php?yyyy=2007&mm=09&dd=04&nav_category=92&nav_id=43514

"Significant part of EU opposes Kosovo recognition"
4 September 2007 | 15:47 | Source: Tanjug
*LONDON -- A British analyst says a "large number" of EU member states 
oppose a declaration of Kosovo's independence.

* In the opinion of Dr. Jonathan Eyal, an analyst at London’s Royal 
United Services Institute, this could lead to the province having a 
status similar to that of Taiwan.

He told the BBC that, "Interestingly, on the subject of a (unilateral) 
proclamation of independence, the split doesn’t run along east-west 
European lines. Spain, Romania, Slovakia, and even Great Britain all 
have their doubts."

Eyal believes that a U.S. recognition of Kosovo's independence would put 
the EU into a difficult position.

"I don’t see how the EU could agree to recognition of a unilateral 
declaration of independence, just as I doubt the Americans would refrain 
from it. For Washington, Kosovo represents an opportunity to show Russia 
that it does not have a right to veto security issues in Europe," said 
Eyal.

That is why the analyst believes that the solution will be to give 
Kosovo a status similar to that of Taiwan.

"The EU won’t recognize Kosovo as an independent country, but will /de 
facto/ cooperate with it, in terms of recognizing passports, opening 
information bureaus instead of diplomatic missions in Priština," he said.

Eyal added that the EU could even persuade the authorities in Priština 
to accept the presence of European armed forces in the field, which 
would take care of law and order, and such a "strange arrangement" would 
allow the EU to avoid not only a Russian veto, but also conflict with 
Washington.

The analyst thinks that it is unusual that "amidst this Russian and 
American one-upmanship, few people have bothered to consider the 
international consequences, which could end up being very serious."

"It’s the West that is breaching international law if it recognizes 
Kosovo," he warned, explaining that it would be most detrimental to 
western Europe, as the U.S. "has never recognized the supremacy of the 
UN and the Security Council in matters of international law," recalling 
that the U.S. had bypassed the Security Council in 1999 when it bombed 
Yugoslavia over Kosovo.

Eyal told the BBC that he does not entirely ruled out the possibility of 
talks between Belgrade and Priština continuing beyond December 10.

The analyst believes that retaining the /status quo/ isn’t "overly 
attractive", although it is certainly "on the table."

"Sadly, the Kosovo question has now gone far beyond just determining its 
status and has become the subject of a serious dispute between the U.S. 
and Russia. I am afraid the State Department may decide to recognize a 
unilateral declaration of Kosovo independence," concluded Eyal.

Одговори путем е-поште