September 20, 2007

Pride and prejudice as Serbs look to Europe

Vuk Jeremic, the Foreign Minister of Serbia, confirms that the status of Kosovo 
remains the biggest hurdle to EU entry

 

Bronwen Maddox 

“I personally agree that there is no Plan B,” Vuk Jeremic, the Serbian Foreign 
Minister, said. “There is only one bright future for the Balkans, and that is 
within Europe.” 

But between Serbia and membership of the European Union lies the hurdle of 
Kosovo, so far insurmountable, and others in the form of indicted war criminals 
sought by The Hague tribunal. 

Mr Jeremic told The Times yesterday that Serbia “is suffering a cooling of 
public support for the idea of Europe”. He added: “I am afraid that if things 
go wrong, if it is not handled well regarding the future status of Kosovo, then 
there will be a dominant majority within Serbia that will say, ‘This is not 
fair, it is humiliating, they [the EU] don’t want us. To hell with it’.” 

That is his best card. Mr Jeremic, of the Democratic Party, part of the 
pro-European coalition that won a parliamentary majority in January, cautioned 
that if Serbia is not given more hope by the EU, and an acceptable deal on 
Kosovo, then it will turn its back on Europe. 

The risk it runs is that other countries will not rate this threat highly 
enough to agree to its demands. The least controversial of these are the 
requests for signs of encouragement from the EU. In London this week, Mr 
Jeremic asked Britain, “as a strong supporter of EU enlargement in the 
Balkans”, to loosen visa restrictions, which are lengthy “and at times 
humiliating”. 

Only a quarter of Serbs who had voted for pro-European parties had been able to 
travel to EU countries, he said. Serbia “has a lot of people with means who 
would like to travel”, he said. “For a long time, we were the most advanced, 
sophisticated”, and Serbs find it humiliating to see “Croats and Romanians 
travelling without visas” when they cannot. 

Pride and humiliation are words that thread through the entire discussion; they 
lie at the heart of Serbia’s position on Kosovo. Mr Jeremic took part in talks 
yesterday with the “troika” of the US, the EU and Russia, before meetings with 
Kosovo representatives next week in the margins of the United Nations General 
Assembly. 

Kosovo, which Serbia regards as its province, and to which it attaches huge 
historical romance, has been under UN administration since 1999, when Nato 
drove out Serb forces, accusing them of atrocities against the ethnic Albanians 
who make up 90 per cent of the population. Serbia has fiercely resisted that 
majority’s calls for independence. 

The troika must report to Ban Ki Moon, the UN Secretary-General, by December 
10. If there has been no progress, Mr Ban will have to decide whether to forge 
ahead with the plan of Martii Ahtisaari, the UN envoy, for “supervised 
independence”, although this might prompt a veto from Russia, a staunch Serb 
ally. Serbia has offered to grant autonomy but not sovereign independence. 

Mr Jeremic said that it was unhelpful to speculate how Serbia might react if 
Kosovo unilaterally declared independence but dismissed the suggestion that it 
might take military action. “We will not use force, we will not contribute to 
the instability” of the Balkans, he said. But he added: “It is only if Belgrade 
and Pristina agree that we will have peace.” 

He argued that Scotland could afford to toy with separation from the UK and 
that Belgium could split into two because they were at peace, but that in the 
Balkans, “where we are still struggling to stabilise”, indulging the 
nationalistic instincts of minorities was too dangerous. 

If Serbia were within the EU, he added, then “borders have a different meaning 
and can be discussed”, although he refused to clarify what this might mean for 
Kosovo. He concluded: “I really hope that early in the next decade Serbia will 
be part of the EU.” 

But the question is whether Serbs are prepared to sacrifice a European future 
to preserve their pride. Mr Jeremic’s warning is that many would do just that. 
The EU, and the UN, have to decide how much that would matter. 

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article2489762.ece



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Одговори путем е-поште