http://www.antiwar.com/malic/?articleid=12225
 January 17, 2008 
A Different Endgame 
Decision in Serbia 
by Nebojsa Malic
Three days from now, citizens of Serbia will head to the polls and cast their 
ballots for their preferred candidate among the seven. Between the media and 
the pollsters, there is an expectation that no candidate will get the necessary 
majority in the first round, and that the second round will be decided between 
the incumbent, Boris Tadic, and his perennial challenger, Tomislav Nikolic. 
Tipping the scales in that case would be the voters sympathetic to Prime 
Minister Vojislav Kostunica, currently precariously allied with Tadic but 
sharing many views with Nikolic, especially concerning Kosovo and the EU.
In fact, this election will be a referendum of sorts on Serbia's future course. 
Nikolic is openly pro-Russian, even though he does not (as some allege) 
advocate isolation from the EU. He also firmly believes in keeping the occupied 
province of Kosovo inside Serbia. Kostunica largely shares these positions, 
although he remains declaratively in favor of EU membership. Tadic, on the 
other hand, gives good lip service to Serbia's integrity, but continues to 
believe that EU membership "has no alternative." He is also handicapped by the 
Western-fostered perceptions that he is "their man" in Serbia, and that he 
would acquiesce to a separation of Kosovo. 
Contrast this with the upcoming elections in the U.S.: not only are there no 
clear front-runners yet, the policies they offer are but slight variations on 
the Imperial theme. With one notable exception, everyone is running for Emperor 
and promising more of the same, just somehow "better" because the "right 
people" would be in charge. Come November, Americans will have less of a choice 
concerning their future than Serbia.
Threadbare Determination
But, isn't Serbia's future whatever the Great Powers decide it would be? 
Certainly, if one listens to the State Department, now is the right time to 
forcibly detach Kosovo from Serbia. Across the ocean, Germany is supposedly 
firmly committed, and Slovenia – whose secession and illegal recognition in 
1991 ignited the Yugoslav Wars – is now chairing the EU and favoring an 
independent "Kosova" as well. 
Even so, assuming the Empire and its European allies are actually the ones to 
decide on Kosovo… why are they waiting for Serbian elections, then? 
It is easy for Washington to be resolute, when the EU is expected to foot the 
bill. Even the best-case scenario envisioned by the Empire sees Kosovo as some 
sort of European dependency, not an actual state. Not only would there be a 
major breach of international law against Serbia, but this sort of "solution" 
would also fail to satisfy the Kosovo Albanians. 
Voices of Dissent
American and European officials have repeatedly claimed that separating Kosovo 
would not set a precedent. The "reality-based community" of some six billion 
people begs to differ. 
Arguments against the madness in Kosovo come from all over. Former U.S. 
Secretary of State, Lawrence Eagleburger (once a champion of anti-Serb 
intervention), called the planned carve-up of Serbia "deeply distressing" 
(Voice of America). A commentator in Czech Business Weekly called EU's Kosovo 
policy "insane." Charles Tannock, British Conservative MEP, recently questioned 
the wisdom of antagonizing Russia and creating a precedent with Kosovo. Retired 
USN Admiral James Lyons warned of a possible "train wreck" with Russia over a 
"Taliban-like state" of Kosovo. Even the Serbophobic commentator Helle Dale of 
the Washington Times seems to be having second thoughts now.
Perhaps the most surprising in its honesty was the report by Michael Levitin in 
the latest edition of Newsweek, titled "Sorry, not interested." At long last, 
Newsweek's reporter explains that Serbian politicians aren't just playing; 
Kosovo is serious business:
"With so much at stake, the West must ask itself whether a free (sic) Kosovo is 
worth further humiliating a volatile, Russia-backed Belgrade in the heart of 
the Balkans. This is one small, poor Eastern state that the EU may eventually 
want more than it wants the EU."
That's worth repeating: the EU may want Serbia more than Serbia wants the EU. 
Shifting the Balance
The Eurocrats may have thought that signing a Stabilization and Association 
Agreement (SAA) with Serbia would foreclose Belgrade's options to resist a 
takeover of Kosovo. The signing is scheduled for January 28, in between the 
first and second round of presidential elections, and is universally assumed to 
be a boost for the pro-EU Tadic. Except that Prime Minister Kostunica has 
already said that sending a EU mission to administer Kosovo would be a clear 
breach of the SAA, turning Brussels' carrot into Belgrade's stick.
On January 18, the Serbian government is supposed to finalize the sale of the 
state-owned oil corporation, NIS, to the Russian giant Gazprom. Finance 
minister Mladjan Dinkic – who has lorded over the Serbian economy since October 
2000 – opposed the deal, and favored Austrian and Hungarian proposals. Moscow 
then released FSB documents showing Dinkic and his tycoon friends had embezzled 
hundreds of millions of dollars from the Serbian treasury. Dinkic had claimed 
to be hunting for the missing millions that Milosevic's government had 
allegedly stolen and squirreled away in Cyprus; if the Russian charges are 
true, Dinkic actually used that money to set up a bank in Moscow, which 
bankrolled penny-buyout privatization bids by government-connected tycoons. 
Dinkic and his G17-Plus party are key allies of President Tadic. 
Moments of Decision
The Empire's course is a bit like the Titanic's: it cannot turn on a dime, even 
if it wished to do so. It is hard to tell whether the arguments raised in 
recent days against the carve-up of Serbia are indicative of a broader 
sentiment in the West, or just a few voices in the wilderness that just 
happened to be published now. That is, if one believes that anything published 
in the mainstream media in the West (or in Serbia, for that matter), "just 
happens."
More so than in previous years, Serbian election results will make a real 
difference, both in that country's future and that of the West. Nine years 
since a fabricated massacre started NATO on the road to aggression, it is 
possible that the Empire's Kosovo gambit has finally failed.


      Be smarter than spam. See how smart SpamGuard is at giving junk email the 
boot with the All-new Yahoo! Mail.  Click on Options in Mail and switch to New 
Mail today or register for free at http://mail.yahoo.ca 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



===============
Group Moderator: [Е-ПОШТА 
ЗАШТИЋЕНА] 
page at http://magazine.sorabia.net
for more informations about current situation in Serbia http://www.sorabia.net 
Slusajte GLAS SORABIJE nas talk internet-radio (Serbian Only)
http://radio.sorabia.net
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sorabia/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sorabia/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[&#1045;-&#1055;&#1054;&#1064;&#1058;&#1040; 
&#1047;&#1040;&#1064;&#1058;&#1048;&#1035;&#1045;&#1053;&#1040;] 
    mailto:[&#1045;-&#1055;&#1054;&#1064;&#1058;&#1040; 
&#1047;&#1040;&#1064;&#1058;&#1048;&#1035;&#1045;&#1053;&#1040;]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [&#1045;-&#1055;&#1054;&#1064;&#1058;&#1040; 
&#1047;&#1040;&#1064;&#1058;&#1048;&#1035;&#1045;&#1053;&#1040;]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Одговори путем е-поште