http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/07/world/europe/07hungarians.html?ex=1208232000&en=dcbfd09cd6a88768&ei=5070&emc=eta1

Sfantu Gheorghe Journal
Kosovo’s Actions Hearten a Hungarian Enclave

Petrut Calinescu for The New York Times

By NICHOLAS KULISH
Published: April 7, 2008

SFANTU GHEORGHE, Romania — Dozens of wreaths trailing ribbons in red, 
white and green, the colors of the Hungarian flag, covered the base of a 
memorial to the 1848 revolution in the town park here on a recent day. 
Deep in the heart of Romania, just one lonely garland bears the 
country’s own blue, yellow and red banner.
Skip to next paragraph
Enlarge This Image
Petrut Calinescu for The New York Times

Romanians there complain that Hungarian memorials, like the one above, 
are flourishing.
The New York Times

Hungarians in central Romania want regional autonomy.

New Year’s is celebrated twice here, first at the stroke of midnight and 
then an hour later, when it is midnight in Budapest. When Kosovo 
declared its independence from Serbia in February, hundreds of the 
town’s Hungarians took to the main square to demonstrate in favor of 
Kosovo, and by extension their own aspirations for autonomy.

A Hungarian minority group is pressing for greater autonomy in a region 
where its members outnumber Romanians. A new and more radical 
organization, the Hungarian Civic Party, has risen to challenge the 
establishment Hungarian party, which has been a member of each coalition 
government since 1996.

Those who argue that independence for Kosovo has set a bad precedent 
tend to talk about frozen conflicts outside the European Union — 
Abkhazia and South Ossetia, in Georgia, and Transnistria in Moldova. But 
even in the European Union, borders are often arbitrary. Many ethnic 
minorities, like the Basques and the Roma, remain stateless while 
others, like the Hungarians in Romania, as well as in Slovakia and 
Serbia, are still separated from their brethren.

The Hungarian minority here, known as Szeklers, certainly believe their 
time for independence has arrived and that their proposed 
semi-autonomous state, Szeklerland, is an impending reality.

“Kosovo is an example, and a very clear one, that if the community wants 
to live under self-government, we have to declare very loudly our will,” 
said Csaba Ferencz, vice president of the Szekler National Council, a 
local Hungarian group founded in 2003 with autonomy as its stated goal. 
Szeklers are a distinct ethnic group from the Magyars, Hungary’s 
dominant population.

Their chances of success appear slim, but they are pressing ahead to the 
chagrin of Romanians here, who say that as a local minority they have 
fewer rights than Hungarians do as a nationwide minority.

The Hungarian region, comprising part of Mures County and all of 
Harghita and Covasna, where Sfantu Gheorghe is the capital, was once a 
border area of the Hungarian kingdom defended by the Szeklers. After 
World War I, the Szeklers found themselves smack in the middle of 
Romania, a few hours drive north through the Carpathian Mountains from 
Bucharest.

The conclusion of the war is best remembered for the harsh terms imposed 
on Germany. But the peace agreement signed by Hungary in 1920, the 
Treaty of Trianon, was arguably even tougher. Hungary lost roughly 
two-thirds of its territory and population, including one-third of its 
Hungarian speakers, in the dissolution of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, a 
loss that to this day is known as the Trianon trauma. (Hungary regained 
most of its lost territories temporarily during World War II.)

Nowhere is the Hungarian minority larger or more vocal in its demands 
for greater independence than in Romania. Hungarians make up 1.5 million 
of Romania’s 22 million people, about half of them Szeklers. Little 
wonder that Romania, a member of the European Union and the host of the 
just-completed NATO summit meeting, joined Slovakia, Serbia and Russia 
in refusing to recognize Kosovo.

Unlike the Kosovars, the Szeklers are asking for autonomy within Romania 
rather than complete independence, leaving foreign policy and national 
defense in the hands of the government in Bucharest. Szeklerland would 
be nearly 4,000 square miles, with just over 800,000 people, 
three-quarters of them Hungarian.

The headquarters of the Szekler National Council sits in a large tan 
stucco house, a short walk from the center of town. Out front hang both 
the European Union flag and that of the Szeklers, a blue field with a 
horizontal gold stripe across the middle and a gold sun and silver star 
on either side. The house was previously the home of a lawyer dedicated 
to the cause of Hungarian self-rule.

The council shares its headquarters with the newly minted Hungarian 
Civic Party, which was approved in March to take part in elections, as 
an alternative to the mainstream Democratic Union of Hungarians in 
Romania. The Democratic Union stands accused, by Romanians in 
particular, of old-fashioned ethnic machine politics. But their Civic 
Party opponents accuse them of selling out.

“Since 1996 they are in the government and we think once they were, they 
represented the interests of the Romanian majority and not the Hungarian 
minority,” said Zoltan Gazda, president of the Sfantu Gheorghe branch of 
the new party.

“We have always respected the Romanian laws in our fight for autonomy, 
but if this does not have a good ending it may raise up other kinds of 
tensions,” Mr. Gazda said. “We have signals that the discontent can 
increase with conflicts.”

Municipal elections on June 1 will be a test of strength between the two 
Hungarian parties before parliamentary elections later in the year. They 
are likely to work out an arrangement to ensure that they do not split 
the vote in the national race.

Under Communism, the dictator Nicolae Ceausescu tried to dilute the 
Hungarian populations by moving Romanians into areas where they were 
concentrated, particularly along the border with Hungary.

Romanians here say the government in Bucharest has subordinated their 
interests in exchange for Hungarian parliamentary votes. For example, 
said Rodica Parvan, a Romanian member of the town council, the national 
government does nothing while subsidies to churches and schools, which 
are largely segregated, are distributed unequally by the 
Hungarian-dominated local government.

However, most of the complaints by the Romanian residents are over 
symbolic snubs, such as the council meetings held only in Hungarian and 
Hungarian-language carols played at Christmastime. On March 15, the 
Hungarian national holiday marking the beginning of the 1848 revolution 
against Hapsburg rule, Ms. Parvan was dismayed to see the Romanian flag 
in front of the county government seat hanging at half-mast.

“They told me the wind blew it down,” she said.



Одговори путем е-поште