http://origin.csmonitor.com/cgi-bin/encryptmail.pl?ID=D0E1F5ECA0D6E1EEA0D3ECE1EDE2F2EFF5E3EB
===
..."The "last
chapter" of the Balkan chaos would close – an end to a decade of a
bloody "Greater Serbia" campaign by Serb strongman Slobodan Milosevic..."

http://origin.csmonitor.com/2008/0623/p07s04-woeu.html

UN chief signals shift on Kosovo
Despite Russian and Serbian opposition, UN Secretary-General Ban Ki Moon said 
Friday the UN would gradually cede its role.
By Robert Marquand | Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor 
from the June 23, 2008 edition
 E-mail   Print   Letter to the Editor   Republish   del.icio.us   digg  
 
Reporter Robert Marquand discusses an encounter with a convoy of Serbs in 
Kosovo.
PRISTINA, KOSOVO -  For 16 months, Russia and the West have been a bit 
eyeball-to-eyeball
in the United Nations Security Council over the status of Kosovo. But
to borrow Dean Rusk's famous phrase during the 1963 Cuban missile
crisis, it appears that UN Secretary-General Ban Ki Moon has just
blinked.

Mr. Ban's concession on Friday appeared to brush
aside Russia's objections and clear the way to end the nine-year
"UNMIK" mission in Kosovo. Last week, Pristina authorities inked a
milestone constitution, following a February declaration of
independence. 
For much of the past nine years, Kosovars described themselves as bystanders in 
their own fate; the future of this gritty city was controlled by Moscow, 
Washington, Brussels, and New York. A UN departure may begin to change that. 
"Ban
Ki Moon has clearly moved closer to the position of those states that
recognize Kosovo, but from the Serb position, they've got what they
wanted," says James Lyon of the International Crisis Group in Belgrade. "They 
have de facto taken Kosovo north of the Ibar River." 
To be sure, Serbs strongly contest Kosovo. On
Friday, a parliament of Kosovo Serbs will meet, backed directly by
Belgrade. The body, considered illegal by Western officials, will
coordinate Serb agencies, police, security, and even Ministry of
Defense offices. It remains an open question whether the European Union
can enter the largest enclave, Mitrovica. 
"What will not be helpful is to push this
problem off," says a senior Western diplomat affiliated with an
international agency. "We don't want Kosovo as an international ward
for years to come…. Drift contributes not just to instability in
Kosovo. It contributes to Serb instability, [which is] the problem in
the region." 
Kosovo is a "second tier" priority for the
United States and the West at a time of an Iran-Israel crisis, the Iraq
war, and Afghanistan. Yet the dispute pits key principles in
international affairs – state sovereignty against the relatively new
concept of self-determination for the Kosovars. It is seen as a test of
whether the Balkans can integrate into Europe – or are destined to
devolve into nationalistic groups. 
On Friday at a special Security Council meeting, Ban described the Kosovo 
problem as the most difficult of his diplomatic career. 
Lacking
Security Council authority, the question of the UN in Kosovo had come
down to Ban's authority as an arbiter, with Moscow saying he couldn't
pull the UN out of the country without the Security Council, and most
Western diplomats saying he could. Ban said Kosovo's newly declared
independence created "profound new realities" on the ground. "It is ...
the view of the United Nations that [a reconfiguration] constitutes the
best possible way in order to manage the situation in Kosovo.…" 
US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said in a
June 19 speech that Russia's internal developments have been a
contributing factor, despite cooperation in many key areas. "[T]here is
some disappointment that we have not been able to move closer to the
common values with Russia that one would have thought possible in
2000," Ms. Rice said. "In fact, it is the internal development of
Russia away from a more democratic course that has been, in some ways,
the hardest part of managing the relationship." 
Even a year ago it was possible to talk about a
orderly, nonviolent, and relatively low-cost resolution of Kosovo.
After nine years, the UN would leave, the EU would come in. The "last
chapter" of the Balkan chaos would close – an end to a decade of a
bloody "Greater Serbia" campaign by Serb strongman Slobodan Milosevic. 
Yet in a fateful miscalculation, diplomats admit
Moscow never agreed to vote affirmatively in the Security Council –
bringing confusion and bickering among allies. Moscow's diplomatic
maneuvering has cost little; the West, in comparison, has spent
billions. 
"You don't have a Security Council resolution,
so you have the Spanish and Greeks opposing progress. You don't have
Serbia isolated," said a Western diplomat, one of several interviewed
off the record in Pristina. "We've got a customs house burned down in
February by the Serbs that no one at NATO has asked to rebuild." 
Lacking Security Council approval, the
complications faced by the Kosovars has strained its capability,
talent, and preparedness. 
"We thought we'd have a quick launch, Security Council approval, and that 
Kosovo would be well down the road toward establishing itself. Instead, we well 
have to muddle through," another Western official said. 
"Kosovo
was thrown a screwball by Serbia," argues Mr. Lyon, "No one expected
Serbia to be able to stymie the Security Council, no one expected
Russia to go to the mat for Serbia, or for Serbs to so vehemently
insist on parallel institutions in their enclaves." 
Currently, instead of the more than 100 nation recognition that sources say the 
US government told Kosovo it would secure, only 43 nations have so far signed 
on ahead of a General Assembly meeting in September. 
The lack of a resolution continues to mean an  uphill climb for Pristina, 
officials say. 
Instead
of a NATO mission that would now be training police and supporting the
new Kosovo government, NATO is still keeping the two sides apart.
Instead of an EU mission on the ground, Brussels is working out
disputes among members. Instead of a single legal system, there are
Kosovar and Serb systems. Instead of an expected isolation of Serbia –
Slovakia, Greece, Spain, and Russia are backing Belgrade's attempt to
subvert the independence. 


      __________________________________________________________________
Connect with friends from any web browser - no download required. Try the new 
Yahoo! Canada Messenger for the Web BETA at 
http://ca.messenger.yahoo.com/webmessengerpromo.php

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


------------------------------------

===============
Group Moderator: [Е-ПОШТА 
ЗАШТИЋЕНА] 
page at http://magazine.sorabia.net
for more informations about current situation in Serbia http://www.sorabia.net 
Slusajte GLAS SORABIJE nas talk internet-radio (Serbian Only)
http://radio.sorabia.net
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sorabia/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sorabia/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[&#1045;-&#1055;&#1054;&#1064;&#1058;&#1040; 
&#1047;&#1040;&#1064;&#1058;&#1048;&#1035;&#1045;&#1053;&#1040;] 
    mailto:[&#1045;-&#1055;&#1054;&#1064;&#1058;&#1040; 
&#1047;&#1040;&#1064;&#1058;&#1048;&#1035;&#1045;&#1053;&#1040;]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [&#1045;-&#1055;&#1054;&#1064;&#1058;&#1040; 
&#1047;&#1040;&#1064;&#1058;&#1048;&#1035;&#1045;&#1053;&#1040;]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Одговори путем е-поште