Anniversary of assassination of King Aleksandar
9 October 2008 | 12:56 | Source: B92
BELGRADE -- Today marks the 74th anniversary of the assassination of 
King Aleksandar I Karađorđević in Marseille, France.

The assassination was organized by the Macedonian revolutionary party, 
the VMRO, and Ante Pavelić’s Ustasha movement.

The assassin was killed at the scene, immediately after the shooting.

Aleksandar was murdered as he sat in his car during a street procession 
through the streets of Marseille, while French Foreign Minister Louis 
Barthou was accidentally shot by a French policeman during the incident 
and died later.

Italy, Hungary and Germany were suspected of involvement in the 
assassination of the Yugoslav King. The League of Nations launched an 
investigation into the involvement of certain countries, in what was, 
according to historian Momčilo Pavlović, the first time that the term 
“International terrorism” had been used.

“Owing to the state of Europe at the time, the Great Powers, via 
manipulation and their policies, managed to divert attention from Italy, 
so that Yugoslavia started to lay the blame at Hungary’s door,” Pavlović 
said.

King Aleksandar was one of the most important Serbian and Yugoslav 
rulers. He based his foreign policy on preserving and improving friendly 
relations with the Great Powers, but was also dedicated to creating the 
so-called Little Entente, whose goal was to fight fascism.

He was one of the pioneers of the Yugoslav idea, which, according to 
then Crown Council member Dragomir Acović, cost him his life.

“The people behind his murder, and the amount of time it took them to 
prepare it, attest to his importance, which went beyond a small country 
as Yugoslavia was back then,” Acović says.

Historians agree that the destiny of the region would probably have 
taken a different course had the king not been murdered. The 
assassination was a huge turning point, as it marked the start of the 
final crisis that could not be averted, historian Čedomir Antić says.

“It’s a big question, what course history would have taken had he lived. 
He was young and he would have probably remained politically active 
during the 1940s and 1950s,” Antić says.

It was one of the first assassinations captured on film, up to the last 
detail, and remains one of the most important historical newsreels. The 
French cameraman who captured not only the assassination, but the bloody 
aftermath too, died almost immediately after the assassination from a 
heart attack caused by stress.

Одговори путем е-поште