OK .. approved .. although I would have preferred consistency.
-phil. On 8/24/20, 12:21 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
On 24.08.2020 11:49, Philip Race wrote:Why is this not using the same text we settled on elsewhere for constructors of abstract classes ?"Constructor for subclasses to call"This was the first review request, before we start to use it. And in the CSR comment, Joe said it is fine as well.
