On Sun, Apr 05, 2009 at 11:11:13AM +0900, Izumi Tsutsui wrote: > > At the moment, I'd say it's not worth adding it if it's not there, and > > not worth taking it out if it is. > > It only had bootxx_ffs. > > Anyway, we have many inconsisntency for LFS in sysinst. > i386 doesn't have bootxx_lfs or newfs_lfs in its ramdisk, > but menus.mi still has "LFS" option for FStype, > make_filesystems() in sysinst/disks.c try to newfs_lfs, > and md_bootxx_name() in sysinst/arch/i386/md.c returns > "/usr/mdec/bootxx_lfs" if root is LFS. > > Maybe all of them should be disabled if LFS is not considered usable.
LFS is not usable in 5.0. For now I think disabling it is fine, but removing it outright probably isn't a good idea. -- David A. Holland [email protected]
