On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 11:17:56PM +0200, Manuel Bouyer wrote: > On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 09:10:07PM +0000, David Holland wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 11:13:19PM +0200, Manuel Bouyer wrote: > > > > I was thinking about that, too. I could add a 'name' node, too: > > > > > > > > net.interfaces.3.name=xvif0.0 > > > > net.interfaces.3.sndq.maxlen=... > > > > > > sure, that would work. > > > > Ugh. Is there some reason we can't just rename the offending interfaces? > > that would break existing scripts. If not pulled up to a release branch > this could be acceptable though. would a name like xvifx-y work ?
FWIW, that was exactly what I was thinking -- David A. Holland dholl...@netbsd.org
