Am 14.09.2009 um 14:24 schrieb Michael Shalayeff:
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 12:44:34PM +0100, Matthias Scheler wrote:On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 11:17:25AM +0000, Michael Shalayeff wrote:pfsync never collided w/ anything. it used "unassigned" proto number.Does it still do that?of course. adding extra udp encapsualtion only kills performance.
maybe we should just note the fact in a CAVEAT section in the manual page.
cu --paranoic mickey (my employers have changed but, the name has remained)
