On Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 02:52:02AM +0000, Christos Zoulas wrote: > In article <20091106183619.ga2...@britannica.bec.de>, > Joerg Sonnenberger <jo...@britannica.bec.de> wrote: > >On Fri, Nov 06, 2009 at 04:53:58PM +0000, Christos Zoulas wrote: > >> >- portability: warnx -> fprintf/perror > >> > >> This change is backwards; > >> we should not be using perror/fprintf but warn/warnx. > > > >I disagree. They are not portable. Many platforms don't have them. > >Some other platforms have functions of the same name, but with different > >behavior (OS X). > > It should autoconf them.
PR 38488. Joerg
