Simon Burge <> wrote:
> > 
> > Simplify tmpfs_itimes() and use vfs_timestamp().  [ ... ]
> Was changing from getnanotime() to effectively nanotime() (via
> vfs_timestamp()) deliberate?  The original intention of using
> getnanotime() for filesystem timestamps was that having a "perfect"
> timestamp was less important than the time taken to obtain the
> timestamp itself.

Yes, deliberate.  It is consistent with other *_itimes() routines.  I doubt
that such performance difference matters in this place.  However, if we want
to move to getnanotime(), then it should be changed in vfs_timestamp().


Reply via email to