On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 01:54:19PM -0800, Jason Thorpe wrote: > > On Dec 3, 2009, at 1:04 PM, Christoph Egger wrote: > > > Module Name: src > > Committed By: cegger > > Date: Thu Dec 3 21:04:29 UTC 2009 > > > > Modified Files: > > src/sys/dev/acpi: acpi.c files.acpi > > Added Files: > > src/sys/dev/acpi: acpi_pci.c acpi_pci.h > > > > Log Message: > > Enumerate ACPI PCI devices. Allows to link PCI with ACPI devices. > > Patch presented on tech-kern@ > > http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-kern/2009/11/28/msg006552.html > > > > Shouldn't we just attach PCI busses @ ACPI instead of mainbus?
ISTM that ACPI is a lot of things, but in this instance, it is "hardware metadata." Existing practice notwithstanding, acpi is not a proper "parent" for any ISA/PCI device/bus driver. (The same goes for isapnp.) IMO, very few devices should attach at acpi, but autoconfiguration should use ACPI data, when it is available, for the "direct" configuration of devices that we would otherwise have to probe for. Dave -- David Young OJC Technologies dyo...@ojctech.com Urbana, IL * (217) 278-3933
