On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 12:58:33PM -0500, Greg A. Woods wrote: > I believe that __UNCONST() in particular is _never_ absolutely necessary > -- it may sometimes save a very few cycles and a few bytes of storage, > but that's the best it can do.
No such luck, at least not until C grows a stronger type system. See for example strchr(3). -- David A. Holland dholl...@netbsd.org
