On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 05:46:27PM +0200, Jukka Ruohonen wrote: > Well wouldn't it then be better to document that "they are not of any use to > the general kernel"? From a quick look around, I see also quite a few > instances of stathz and profhz being used/defined.
Sure, because each platform has a specific implementation of the clock interrupts. That doesn't change anything about stathz being an implementation detail. Joerg
