On Sat, Jun 05, 2010 at 11:28:31PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: > : I looked at it and it appears to me that it's a change to use > : non-sized types (that are guaranteed to be large enough) in the > : in-memory structures. If we ever do a port to a 36-bit machine or > : whatever it's probably desirable. > > If you ever port to a 36-bit machine, you are going to have to lie and > define int32_t as 'int' anyway....
Well, maybe... it would be sort of interesting to try, actually. -- David A. Holland dholl...@netbsd.org
