On Tue Jun 15 2010 at 05:00:59 +0000, David Holland wrote: > On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 06:57:21PM +0300, Antti Kantee wrote: > > > So I was meaning to ask: why does "anita test" not install /usr/share, > > > > Dunno. I'm guessing "it's not necessary to fullfill anita's mission". > > Well, I guess, but I would have expected it to install everything by > default, as otherwise there could in theory be a problem with the sets > it leaves off...
Such as? The man pages not being accurate? web2a containing misspelled words ?) (yes, i guess there's stuff like zoneinfo which actually could be tested) > > Second, working on the definition of "randomly missing". Stay tuned. > > I think it's hiding somewhere near the definition of "random number". > Nine is a very random number. (http://www.dilbert.com/2001-10-25/) Nine is not random at all. It's not even a prime (although that's the problem with factor(6): you can never be sure). Everyone knows 3 and 7 are much more random.
