On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 06:22:46PM +0300, Jukka Ruohonen wrote: > > I think it actually does, but only at run-time. It will end up counting > > as a bogus test program. > > Another question: was a conclusion ever reached about the preferred > directory structure for the tests? I've been now following the same > structure used in the actual src, but many things are in ../tests/util.
The stuff in util/ predates the decision to use a matching directory structure. It hasn't been renamed because of inertia, I guess, combined with cvs issues and perhaps the faint hope we might get version control with rename before the end of the next millennium. -- David A. Holland dholl...@netbsd.org
