In article <>,
Bernd Ernesti  <> wrote:
>On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 01:49:30AM +0000, Christos Zoulas wrote:
>> In article <>,
>> Joerg Sonnenberger  <> wrote:
>> >Did you test this change for breaking compatibility with 3rd party
>> >scripts that parse the output of unzip?
>> >
>> I thought about that, but where does one find such scripts? Providing
>> a flag to make backwards compatible output is another way of doing it,
>> but is it worth it?
>No, just back the change out because the output should look the same as
>the 'normal' unzip does.
>The change is nice but should not be done as long as the official unzip
>still use the old output.

Fine, reverted.


Reply via email to