In article <[email protected]>, Bernd Ernesti <[email protected]> wrote: >On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 01:49:30AM +0000, Christos Zoulas wrote: >> In article <[email protected]>, >> Joerg Sonnenberger <[email protected]> wrote: >> >Did you test this change for breaking compatibility with 3rd party >> >scripts that parse the output of unzip? >> > >> >> I thought about that, but where does one find such scripts? Providing >> a flag to make backwards compatible output is another way of doing it, >> but is it worth it? > >No, just back the change out because the output should look the same as >the 'normal' unzip does. >The change is nice but should not be done as long as the official unzip >still use the old output.
Fine, reverted. christos
