In article <[email protected]>, Valeriy E. Ushakov <[email protected]> wrote: > >But that is not what the code was. The code was: > > char c; if (c == CHAR_MAX) ... > >and *that* is portable. As I said in another mail to thsi thread that >went unanswered, it is literally schizophrenic of lint to complain >about it.
How can lint know that if (c == 255) is portable? Because CHAR_MAX gets expanded by cpp to 255 before lint parses the file. christos
