On Apr 23, 3:25pm, mar...@duskware.de (Martin Husemann) wrote: -- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/tests/lib/libc/gen
| On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 09:05:25AM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote: | > Keep reading and then it is the following table: | | *sigh* | | And then: | | For some implementations, the value of si_addr may be inaccurate. | | Can we just bail and use that as an excuse? | The value on amd64 seems to be completely unrelated to both addresses. | Anyway, fixing sparc64... As I mentioned before, the only way to exceed the standard is to provide implementation specific notes (i.e. document what each architecture does). To improve even more, we can provide si_instr to be the faulting instruction and si_fault to be the faulting address, and have each architecture fill what is available. In practice, I doubt that many programs use this feaute. christos
