On Apr 2, 1:22am, tsut...@ceres.dti.ne.jp (Izumi Tsutsui) wrote: -- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/lib/libpthread
| > It depends on where we build 3rd party binaries. If we build on | > the earliest branch there is no problem. But if we build in the | > latest one there is. We should write the rules down, so that we | > don't repeat the same problem on each release. Perhaps the best | > solution is to add the missing function on all branches, but that | > does not help those who did not upgrade. | | Can't we simply revert ticket #722 (pthread_condattr_setclock(3) addition)? | Is that function really necessary for 6.1? I think it is too late now. christos