Am 12.10.13 20:24, schrieb Alistair Crooks: > On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 05:24:07PM +0000, Marc Balmer wrote: >> +#ifndef NO_LUA_SUPPORT >> +#include <lua.h> >> +#endif > > Thanks for doing this, it's nice to get more lua support in-tree. > > I really dislike the double negative in this one, though - it's much > easier for everyone if the definition was HAVE_LUA_SUPPORT and default > it to defined, or yes, or whatever.
I followed the general pattern in httpd of defining NO_<WHATEVER>_SUPPORT in bozohttpd for consistency. Almost all other options like CGI, SSL etc, are defined in this - admittetly weird - way.
