Am 03.03.15 um 21:22 schrieb Greg Troxel: > > Marc Balmer <m...@msys.ch> writes: > >> Am 03.03.15 um 14:35 schrieb Greg Troxel: >>> >>> chris...@astron.com (Christos Zoulas) writes: >>> >>>> If we want to make every single change to go through >>>> tech-userlevel, we should institute a rule to do so. To my >>>> knowledge we don't have yet such a rule. We already have the >>>> rest of the p* programs which originated in Solaris, we were >>>> missing this one, so it made sense to me to add it. >>> >>> We do sort of have a rule, which is that significant changes >>> need discussion. I would say adding programs to base always >>> counts. Other than that, it's trickier, but if there's a >>> reasonable likelihood of a valid objection, I'd say it's over >>> the line into signficant/discuss. >> >> Adding new stuff bears a low risk of breaking existing stuff, so >> I think it does not need discussion all the time. > > I meant that adding to base was discuss-worthy because there's a > "bloat or necessary" question, not because of risk of breakage.
Sure. So how much "bloat" is pwait? Is it a huge piece of software or a small utility? I think that matters a bit.
