On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 8:44 PM, Matt Thomas <m...@3am-software.com> wrote:
>
>> On Apr 7, 2015, at 1:27 AM, Ryota Ozaki <ozak...@netbsd.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Nick Hudson <sk...@netbsd.org> wrote:
>>> On 04/07/15 04:19, Ryota Ozaki wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Module Name:    src
>>>> Committed By:   ozaki-r
>>>> Date:           Tue Apr  7 03:19:25 UTC 2015
>>>>
>>>> Modified Files:
>>>>       src/sys/arch/arm/ep93xx: ep93xx_intr.c
>>>>       src/sys/arch/arm/ixp12x0: ixp12x0_intr.c
>>>>
>>>> Log Message:
>>>> Add missing #include <arm/cpu.h>
>>>>
>>> <sys/lwp.h> is preferred, I think
>>
>> I see. It works for me too. I'll change so.
>>
>> Just curious, why is <sys/lwp.h> better?
>> Because it is MI while <arm/cpu.h> is MD?
>
> arm/cpu.h has a dependency on sys/lwp.h

Got it. I looked your recent commit (sys/sys/lwp.h v1.170).

Thanks,
  ozaki-r

Reply via email to