On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 8:44 PM, Matt Thomas <m...@3am-software.com> wrote: > >> On Apr 7, 2015, at 1:27 AM, Ryota Ozaki <ozak...@netbsd.org> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Nick Hudson <sk...@netbsd.org> wrote: >>> On 04/07/15 04:19, Ryota Ozaki wrote: >>>> >>>> Module Name: src >>>> Committed By: ozaki-r >>>> Date: Tue Apr 7 03:19:25 UTC 2015 >>>> >>>> Modified Files: >>>> src/sys/arch/arm/ep93xx: ep93xx_intr.c >>>> src/sys/arch/arm/ixp12x0: ixp12x0_intr.c >>>> >>>> Log Message: >>>> Add missing #include <arm/cpu.h> >>>> >>> <sys/lwp.h> is preferred, I think >> >> I see. It works for me too. I'll change so. >> >> Just curious, why is <sys/lwp.h> better? >> Because it is MI while <arm/cpu.h> is MD? > > arm/cpu.h has a dependency on sys/lwp.h
Got it. I looked your recent commit (sys/sys/lwp.h v1.170). Thanks, ozaki-r