skrll@ wrote: > > (i.e. reverting removed lines is not "fix" but workaround). > > Not sure what you mean here, but as bad cache aliases can happen my > change is valid.
Well, I have been waitng proper description about the new UVM design for VIPT cache systems (i.e. what's the "right" thing) for >5 years, as mentioned in the PR... If it doesn't work as expected, I think it would be better to remove all useless COLORMATCH code. --- Izumi Tsutsui
