skrll@ wrote:

> > (i.e. reverting removed lines is not "fix" but workaround).
> Not sure what you mean here, but as bad cache aliases can happen my 
> change is valid.

Well, I have been waitng proper description about the new UVM design
for VIPT cache systems (i.e. what's the "right" thing) for >5 years,
as mentioned in the PR...

If it doesn't work as expected, I think it would be better to remove
all useless COLORMATCH code.

Izumi Tsutsui

Reply via email to