On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 01:27:00AM +0000, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> In article <20161012220744.gb...@britannica.bec.de>,
> Joerg Sonnenberger <jo...@bec.de> wrote:
> >So strchrnul(a,b) seems to be a + strcspn(a,b), just in a non-portable
> >way. I don't see the point of it at all. Please revert this. Also hit
> >anyone using strchrnul with a cluebat please...
> That would be gdb... I can revert, but then I will have to add more hacks
> to gnu software...
Given that the workaround is a trivial inline function, I'd strongly
prefer that. The cluebat should still be applied.