In article <20161102003956.35d12f...@cvs.netbsd.org>,
Paul Goyette <source-changes-d@NetBSD.org> wrote:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>+ /* Handle overflow */
>+ if ((size_t)count >= *len) {
>+ *dest += *len - 1;
>+ *len = 1;Why *len = 1 here? Shouldn't it be 0 since there is no more room left? christos
