On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 09:46:09PM +0900, Rin Okuyama wrote:
> On 2016/11/16 18:33, Michael van Elst wrote:
> >So I suggest to make the compat32 code handle CLOCK_NTP_ADJTIME even
> >when compiled with !NTP but just return ENOTTY.
> >
> >N.B. clockctlioctl returns EINVAL for unrecognized ioctl commands,
> >it should also return ENOTTY.
>
> I wrote a patch. Besides your suggestions, I protected NTP stuff in
> compat50 codes by NTP macro. Is it ok with you?
Looks fine to me.
--
Michael van Elst
Internet: mlel...@serpens.de
"A potential Snark may lurk in every tree."
