On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 09:38:32AM +0200, Maxime Villard wrote:
>
> No. It is clear that none of the proposals in the recent threads has brought
> unanimous consensus, but this sysctl appears to be the least problematic
> solution. You can speculate endlessly on how difficult it is to type
> "modload",
> on how many more sysctls we need to add to do autoloads, on where to put the
> functions, the #ifdefs, the options, and so on; meanwhile, I'm going to get
> things done. For now it's a sysctl - if you have a better and implementable
> idea, I'll be happy to hear about it and to work on it.
Actually I did suggest to make the default dependant on MODULAR.
Nobody commented on this.
--
Manuel Bouyer <bou...@antioche.eu.org>
NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--
