Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2018 03:29:54 +0300 From: Valery Ushakov <u...@stderr.spb.ru> Message-ID: <20180318002954.gl3...@pony.stderr.spb.ru>
| At this point I'm inclined to just chalk it up to English culture | being nominalistic par excelence and give up any further attempts to | find common viewpoint. That's probably the right approach, for both of us - after all, what we're discussing is really not very important to anything - it does not really matter what the man page - I hesitate to call it section, as in man pages "sections" have a different meaning, but ignoring that, that is what it is, so - section is called, nor where it is placed. As long as the information is there, can be found, and is correct (and ideally comprehensible as well) that's what really matters. All the rest is just window dressing, about which there can be a myriad of opinions, no-one is really right, or wrong, all just have different opinions - continuing to argue ("discuss") really achieves nothing, as no-one can really provide any particularly good reason for their opinion, beyond that they believe it to be correct. | If there are no objections, I'd like to move that material as-is | (including LINENO section) accordingly and drop the ENVIRONMENT | section. If you move text around, take care to find the "above" and "below" and similar references scattered elsewhere and make sure they're still appropriate as well. And this would probably be better mentioned first on some list that isn't source-changes-d, and with a Subject that is more informative. kre