In article <0a88399a-0897-160e-6a56-ae328bd4c...@gmx.com>, Kamil Rytarowski <n...@gmx.com> wrote: >-=-=-=-=-=- >-=-=-=-=-=- > >> This is not the correct fix. No change to set_status should happen at any >> index >= SET_LAST, you are papering over the real bug. >> >> Please provide more information where this access happens if easily available >> (or let me debug it properly).
Fixed. christos
