On 04.04.2019 21:32, Christos Zoulas wrote: > In article <86734bad-b0e6-57dc-3e0f-5d7c124fa...@gmx.com>, > Kamil Rytarowski <n...@gmx.com> wrote: >> -=-=-=-=-=- >> -=-=-=-=-=- >> >> On 04.04.2019 02:42, Christos Zoulas wrote: >>> Intermediate or not quality counts .... It would have been simple >> enough to write the function once and call it from 13 places, perhaps >> even less work! >>> >> >> It does. I'm waiting now on releng test results (the service seems to be >> returning 503) and I will switch to a centralized form. >> >> Quality matters so I will also fixup in one go vfork(2) KTR reports in a >> child. It was handled accordingly only in the MD version for sparc and >> sparc64 and shall be centralized. > > Thanks! I was oversensitized because I had to gc 13 slightly different MD > copies of setdisklabel(9). > > christos >
Done. I'm still working on adding more test scenarios for fork-related events. I've just covered basic clone(2) scenarios and undisclosed another bug in the code sitting since 2012.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
