> On Jan 25, 2020, at 6:31 AM, Christos Zoulas <chris...@astron.com> wrote: > >> This seems a little silly to have in the kernel configuration file. I >> think there's an argument to be made that there should be a header that >> sets these defaults that can be tuned per-platform (or even some >> functionality to tune this at run-time). > > sysctl :-) Shouldn't HAVE to know about the sysctl, either. It should default to "good performance". -- thorpej
- CVS commit: src/sys/arch/evbarm/conf Martin Husemann
- CVS commit: src/sys/arch/evbarm/conf Martin Husemann
- CVS commit: src/sys/arch/evbarm/conf Jared D. McNeill
- CVS commit: src/sys/arch/evbarm/conf Jared D. McNeill
- Re: CVS commit: src/sys/arch/evbarm/conf Jason Thorpe
- Re: CVS commit: src/sys/arch/evbarm/conf Christos Zoulas
- Re: CVS commit: src/sys/arch/evbarm/conf Jason Thorpe
- Re: CVS commit: src/sys/arch/evbarm/conf Jonathan A. Kollasch
- Re: CVS commit: src/sys/arch/evbarm/conf Jared McNeill
- Re: CVS commit: src/sys/arch/evbarm/conf Jared McNeill
- CVS commit: src/sys/arch/evbarm/conf SAITOH Masanobu
- CVS commit: src/sys/arch/evbarm/conf SAITOH Masanobu
- CVS commit: src/sys/arch/evbarm/conf Jason R Thorpe
- CVS commit: src/sys/arch/evbarm/conf Jason R Thorpe
- CVS commit: src/sys/arch/evbarm/conf Rin Okuyama
- re: CVS commit: src/sys/arch/evbarm/conf matthew green
- Re: CVS commit: src/sys/arch/evbarm/conf Rin Okuyama