On Sun, Aug 02, 2020 at 01:57:11PM +0000, Taylor R Campbell wrote:
> But it sounds like the original motivation is that it triggered
> -Wvla...which frankly strikes me as a compiler bug since there's
> obviously no actual VLA created in sizeof; as far as I can tell
> there's no semantic difference between sizeof(device_t[n]) and
> sizeof(device_t) * n.

Yes, it seems strange to trigger a VLA warning in code that it is
required to be compile-time evaluated.


Reply via email to