What's wrong with printf("%s", NULL)? It produces '(null)', and at
least it's visible something is missing there. I think gcc 9.3 is
overly eager for this.Is it correct to just omit the parameter altogether and change output format? Jaromir Le dim. 6 sept. 2020 à 04:41, matthew green <m...@netbsd.org> a écrit : > > Module Name: src > Committed By: mrg > Date: Sun Sep 6 02:34:03 UTC 2020 > > Modified Files: > src/sbin/amrctl: amrctl.c > > Log Message: > avoid calling printf() %s with NULL. > > > To generate a diff of this commit: > cvs rdiff -u -r1.11 -r1.12 src/sbin/amrctl/amrctl.c > > Please note that diffs are not public domain; they are subject to the > copyright notices on the relevant files. >
