On 2020/09/10 18:28, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
On 10.09.2020 10:50, Rin Okuyama wrote:
On 2020/09/10 16:41, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
On 10.09.2020 03:53, Rin Okuyama wrote:
Module Name:    src
Committed By:    rin
Date:        Thu Sep 10 01:53:22 UTC 2020

Modified Files:
     src/distrib/sets/lists/base: mi
     src/distrib/sets/lists/comp: mi
     src/sys/dev: Makefile

Log Message:
Unconditionally install kernel headers for iSCSI as required by
sanitizer shipped with GCC9.

Fix build release with HAVE_GCC=9 for sun2, where MKISCSI=no by default.

Please redo this commit with __has_include(), example:


Hmm, I'm not sure whether it is worth the maintenance cost and
complexities it adds... Is there any reason why we should not
install these headers?

The headers are optional and sanitizers shall not dictate what headers
are installed.

Meanwhile, I'm going to do this in upstream LLVM.

Yes, I really appreciate your continuous efforts in syncing our
codes with upstream.

However, still, there is ``the maintenance cost'' in our local
repository. With __has_include(), we must maintain two copies of
headers in the tree. This is dangerous potentially.

My question was whether it is worth the risk not to install few
number of small headers.


Reply via email to