Robert Elz wrote: > Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2021 06:31:53 +0000 > From: "Simon Burge" <sim...@netbsd.org> > Message-ID: <20210402063153.773c7f...@cvs.netbsd.org> > > | Add an XXX reminder to convert at(1) to use parsedate(3) in <util.h>. > > If that's intended as an optional facility (at -d ... or something), > then fine, but please don't make parsedate the standard way to input > at dates (just as it isn't the standard way to set the date using date(1), > it is way too fragile and cantankerous for something that should be reliable.
That's good to know about parsedate(3). I hadn't considered that what looked more flexible could also be fragile and cantankerous :). I'll revert that comment. Cheers, Simon.
