In article <ylwtlsapbfxoe...@bec.de>, Joerg Sonnenberger  <jo...@bec.de> wrote:
>On Fri, Jun 04, 2021 at 10:20:24PM -0000, Christos Zoulas wrote:
>> In article <yllbslviz+qoi...@bec.de>, Joerg Sonnenberger 
><jo...@bec.de> wrote:
>> >On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 04:17:37PM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote:
>> >> Module Name:      src
>> >> Committed By:     christos
>> >> Date:             Thu Jun  3 20:17:37 UTC 2021
>> >> 
>> >> Modified Files:
>> >>   src/tests/lib/csu: h_ifunc_static.c
>> >> 
>> >> Log Message:
>> >> PR/56230: Jan-Benedict Glaw: arm oabi does not and will not have ifunc
>> >support.
>> >
>> >As I mentioned elsewhere, I disagree with this change. OABI is dead and
>> >only really support for legacy compatibility. All the OABI build
>> >variants should be removed and this is strongly a step in the wrong
>> >direction.
>> 
>> I think it is better to do it after the 10 branch. It is not just removing
>> the build.sh targets, we need to remove the compat glue and fix the sets,
>> and perhaps something else I am missing. I will revert the two changes
>> once we remove all oabi support.
>
>I don't see how that's related. I'm not talking about removing the
>compat layer right now. Remove the build.sh targets and call it a day.

CC:ed tech-toolchain. Does everyone agree to remove the oabi build targets?

christos

Reply via email to