Module Name:    src
Committed By:   rillig
Date:           Fri Apr  8 21:29:29 UTC 2022

Modified Files:
        src/distrib/sets/lists/tests: mi
        src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1: Makefile decl_enum.c decl_enum.exp
            msg_042.c msg_042.exp msg_043.c msg_043.exp msg_045.c msg_045.exp
            msg_048.c msg_048.exp msg_069.c msg_069.exp msg_070.c
        src/usr.bin/xlint/lint1: err.c
Removed Files:
        src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1: msg_070.exp

Log Message:
lint: remove unused message 70, add some more tests


To generate a diff of this commit:
cvs rdiff -u -r1.1190 -r1.1191 src/distrib/sets/lists/tests/mi
cvs rdiff -u -r1.118 -r1.119 src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/Makefile
cvs rdiff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/decl_enum.c \
    src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/decl_enum.exp
cvs rdiff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_042.c \
    src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_042.exp \
    src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_043.c \
    src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_043.exp \
    src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_045.c \
    src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_045.exp \
    src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_048.c \
    src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_048.exp \
    src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_069.c \
    src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_069.exp \
    src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_070.c
cvs rdiff -u -r1.2 -r0 src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_070.exp
cvs rdiff -u -r1.158 -r1.159 src/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/err.c

Please note that diffs are not public domain; they are subject to the
copyright notices on the relevant files.

Modified files:

Index: src/distrib/sets/lists/tests/mi
diff -u src/distrib/sets/lists/tests/mi:1.1190 src/distrib/sets/lists/tests/mi:1.1191
--- src/distrib/sets/lists/tests/mi:1.1190	Tue Apr  5 23:09:19 2022
+++ src/distrib/sets/lists/tests/mi	Fri Apr  8 21:29:29 2022
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-# $NetBSD: mi,v 1.1190 2022/04/05 23:09:19 rillig Exp $
+# $NetBSD: mi,v 1.1191 2022/04/08 21:29:29 rillig Exp $
 #
 # Note: don't delete entries from here - mark them as "obsolete" instead.
 #
@@ -6686,7 +6686,7 @@
 ./usr/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_069.c			tests-usr.bin-tests	compattestfile,atf
 ./usr/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_069.exp			tests-usr.bin-tests	compattestfile,atf
 ./usr/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_070.c			tests-usr.bin-tests	compattestfile,atf
-./usr/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_070.exp			tests-usr.bin-tests	compattestfile,atf
+./usr/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_070.exp			tests-obsolete		obsolete,atf
 ./usr/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_071.c			tests-usr.bin-tests	compattestfile,atf
 ./usr/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_071.exp			tests-usr.bin-tests	compattestfile,atf
 ./usr/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_072.c			tests-usr.bin-tests	compattestfile,atf

Index: src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/Makefile
diff -u src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/Makefile:1.118 src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/Makefile:1.119
--- src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/Makefile:1.118	Tue Apr  5 23:09:19 2022
+++ src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/Makefile	Fri Apr  8 21:29:29 2022
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-# $NetBSD: Makefile,v 1.118 2022/04/05 23:09:19 rillig Exp $
+# $NetBSD: Makefile,v 1.119 2022/04/08 21:29:29 rillig Exp $
 
 NOMAN=		# defined
 MAX_MESSAGE=	348		# see lint1/err.c
@@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ FILES+=		lex_wide_char.c
 FILES+=		lex_wide_char.exp
 FILES+=		lex_wide_string.c
 FILES+=		lex_wide_string.exp
-FILES+=		${:U0 ${:U:${:Urange=${MAX_MESSAGE}}}:C,^.$,0&,:C,^..$,0&,:@i@msg_${i}.c msg_${i}.exp@:Nmsg_040.exp:Nmsg_176.exp}
+FILES+=		${MSG_FILES}
 FILES+=		msg_001_c90.c
 FILES+=		msg_001_c90.exp
 FILES+=		msg_000_c90.c
@@ -266,6 +266,12 @@ FILES+=		stmt_goto.exp
 FILES+=		stmt_if.c
 FILES+=		stmt_if.exp
 
+MSG_IDS=	${:U0 ${:U:${:Urange=${MAX_MESSAGE}}}:C,^.$,0&,:C,^..$,0&,}
+MSG_FILES=	${MSG_IDS:@id@msg_${id}.c ${MSG_NO_EXP.${id}:D:Umsg_${id}.exp}@}
+MSG_NO_EXP.040=	yes
+MSG_NO_EXP.070=	yes
+MSG_NO_EXP.176=	yes
+
 # Note: only works for adding tests.
 # To remove a test, the $$mi file must be edited manually.
 sync-mi: .PHONY

Index: src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/decl_enum.c
diff -u src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/decl_enum.c:1.1 src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/decl_enum.c:1.2
--- src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/decl_enum.c:1.1	Thu Jul 15 21:00:05 2021
+++ src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/decl_enum.c	Fri Apr  8 21:29:29 2022
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/*	$NetBSD: decl_enum.c,v 1.1 2021/07/15 21:00:05 rillig Exp $	*/
+/*	$NetBSD: decl_enum.c,v 1.2 2022/04/08 21:29:29 rillig Exp $	*/
 # 3 "decl_enum.c"
 
 /*
@@ -17,3 +17,44 @@ enum goto {
 	A
 };
 /* expect-1: warning: empty declaration [0] */
+
+
+/*
+ * Ensure that nested enum declarations get the value of each enum constant
+ * right.  The variable containing the "current enum value" does not account
+ * for these nested declarations.  Such declarations don't occur in practice
+ * though.
+ */
+enum outer {
+	o1 = sizeof(
+	    enum inner {
+		    i1 = 10000, i2, i3
+	    }
+	),
+	/*
+	 * The only attribute that GCC 12 allows for enum constants is
+	 * __deprecated__, and there is no way to smuggle an integer constant
+	 * expression into the attribute.  If there were a way, and the
+	 * expression contained an enum declaration, the value of the outer
+	 * enum constant would become the value of the last seen inner enum
+	 * constant.  This is because 'enumval' is a simple scalar variable,
+	 * not a stack.  If it should ever become necessary to account for
+	 * nested enum declarations, a field should be added in dinfo_t.
+	 */
+	o2 __attribute__((__deprecated__)),
+	o3 = i3
+};
+
+/* expect+1: error: negative array dimension (-10000) [20] */
+typedef int reveal_i1[-i1];
+/* expect+1: error: negative array dimension (-10001) [20] */
+typedef int reveal_i2[-i2];
+/* expect+1: error: negative array dimension (-10002) [20] */
+typedef int reveal_i3[-i3];
+
+/* expect+1: error: negative array dimension (-4) [20] */
+typedef int reveal_o1[-o1];
+/* expect+1: error: negative array dimension (-5) [20] */
+typedef int reveal_o2[-o2];
+/* expect+1: error: negative array dimension (-10002) [20] */
+typedef int reveal_o3[-o3];
Index: src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/decl_enum.exp
diff -u src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/decl_enum.exp:1.1 src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/decl_enum.exp:1.2
--- src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/decl_enum.exp:1.1	Thu Jul 15 21:00:05 2021
+++ src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/decl_enum.exp	Fri Apr  8 21:29:29 2022
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
 decl_enum.c(11): error: syntax error 'goto' [249]
 decl_enum.c(16): error: syntax error 'goto' [249]
 decl_enum.c(18): warning: empty declaration [0]
+decl_enum.c(49): error: negative array dimension (-10000) [20]
+decl_enum.c(51): error: negative array dimension (-10001) [20]
+decl_enum.c(53): error: negative array dimension (-10002) [20]
+decl_enum.c(56): error: negative array dimension (-4) [20]
+decl_enum.c(58): error: negative array dimension (-5) [20]
+decl_enum.c(60): error: negative array dimension (-10002) [20]

Index: src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_042.c
diff -u src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_042.c:1.2 src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_042.c:1.3
--- src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_042.c:1.2	Sun Feb 21 09:07:58 2021
+++ src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_042.c	Fri Apr  8 21:29:29 2022
@@ -1,7 +1,13 @@
-/*	$NetBSD: msg_042.c,v 1.2 2021/02/21 09:07:58 rillig Exp $	*/
+/*	$NetBSD: msg_042.c,v 1.3 2022/04/08 21:29:29 rillig Exp $	*/
 # 3 "msg_042.c"
 
-// Test for message: forward reference to enum type [42]
+/* Test for message: forward reference to enum type [42] */
 
-TODO: "Add example code that triggers the above message." /* expect: 249 */
-TODO: "Add example code that almost triggers the above message."
+/* lint1-extra-flags: -p */
+
+/* expect+1: warning: forward reference to enum type [42] */
+enum forward;
+
+enum forward {
+	defined
+};
Index: src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_042.exp
diff -u src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_042.exp:1.2 src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_042.exp:1.3
--- src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_042.exp:1.2	Sun Mar 21 20:44:59 2021
+++ src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_042.exp	Fri Apr  8 21:29:29 2022
@@ -1 +1 @@
-msg_042.c(6): error: syntax error ':' [249]
+msg_042.c(9): warning: forward reference to enum type [42]
Index: src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_043.c
diff -u src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_043.c:1.2 src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_043.c:1.3
--- src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_043.c:1.2	Sun Feb 21 09:07:58 2021
+++ src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_043.c	Fri Apr  8 21:29:29 2022
@@ -1,7 +1,19 @@
-/*	$NetBSD: msg_043.c,v 1.2 2021/02/21 09:07:58 rillig Exp $	*/
+/*	$NetBSD: msg_043.c,v 1.3 2022/04/08 21:29:29 rillig Exp $	*/
 # 3 "msg_043.c"
 
-// Test for message: redefinition hides earlier one: %s [43]
+/* Test for message: redefinition hides earlier one: %s [43] */
 
-TODO: "Add example code that triggers the above message." /* expect: 249 */
-TODO: "Add example code that almost triggers the above message."
+/* lint1-extra-flags: -h */
+
+struct s {
+	int member;
+};
+
+void
+example(void)
+{
+	/* expect+1: warning: redefinition hides earlier one: s [43] */
+	struct s {
+		int member;
+	};
+}
Index: src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_043.exp
diff -u src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_043.exp:1.2 src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_043.exp:1.3
--- src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_043.exp:1.2	Sun Mar 21 20:44:59 2021
+++ src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_043.exp	Fri Apr  8 21:29:29 2022
@@ -1 +1 @@
-msg_043.c(6): error: syntax error ':' [249]
+msg_043.c(16): warning: redefinition hides earlier one: s [43]
Index: src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_045.c
diff -u src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_045.c:1.2 src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_045.c:1.3
--- src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_045.c:1.2	Sun Feb 21 09:07:58 2021
+++ src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_045.c	Fri Apr  8 21:29:29 2022
@@ -1,7 +1,21 @@
-/*	$NetBSD: msg_045.c,v 1.2 2021/02/21 09:07:58 rillig Exp $	*/
+/*	$NetBSD: msg_045.c,v 1.3 2022/04/08 21:29:29 rillig Exp $	*/
 # 3 "msg_045.c"
 
-// Test for message: base type is really '%s %s' [45]
+/* Test for message: base type is really '%s %s' [45] */
 
-TODO: "Add example code that triggers the above message." /* expect: 249 */
-TODO: "Add example code that almost triggers the above message."
+/* lint1-flags: -tw */
+
+struct counter {
+	int value;
+};
+
+function()
+{
+	/* expect+4: warning: base type is really 'struct counter' [45] */
+	/* expect+3: warning: declaration introduces new type in ANSI C: union counter [44] */
+	/* expect+2: error: 'counter' has incomplete type 'incomplete union counter' [31] */
+	/* expect+1: warning: union counter never defined [234] */
+	union counter counter;
+	/* expect+1: warning: illegal member use: value [102] */
+	counter.value++;
+}
Index: src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_045.exp
diff -u src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_045.exp:1.2 src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_045.exp:1.3
--- src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_045.exp:1.2	Sun Mar 21 20:44:59 2021
+++ src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_045.exp	Fri Apr  8 21:29:29 2022
@@ -1 +1,5 @@
-msg_045.c(6): error: syntax error ':' [249]
+msg_045.c(18): warning: base type is really 'struct counter' [45]
+msg_045.c(18): warning: declaration introduces new type in ANSI C: union counter [44]
+msg_045.c(18): error: 'counter' has incomplete type 'incomplete union counter' [31]
+msg_045.c(20): warning: illegal member use: value [102]
+msg_045.c(18): warning: union counter never defined [234]
Index: src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_048.c
diff -u src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_048.c:1.2 src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_048.c:1.3
--- src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_048.c:1.2	Sun Feb 21 09:07:58 2021
+++ src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_048.c	Fri Apr  8 21:29:29 2022
@@ -1,7 +1,24 @@
-/*	$NetBSD: msg_048.c,v 1.2 2021/02/21 09:07:58 rillig Exp $	*/
+/*	$NetBSD: msg_048.c,v 1.3 2022/04/08 21:29:29 rillig Exp $	*/
 # 3 "msg_048.c"
 
 // Test for message: overflow in enumeration values: %s [48]
 
+/*
+ * Before decl.c 1.TODO from 2022-04-TODO, the comparison for enum constant
+ * overflow was done in signed arithmetic, and since 'enumval' wrapped
+ * around, its value became INT_MIN, at least on platforms where integer
+ * overflow was defined as 2-complements wrap-around.  When comparing
+ * 'enumval - 1 == TARG_INT_MAX', there was another integer overflow, and
+ * this one was optimized away by GCC, taking advantage of the undefined
+ * behavior.
+ */
+enum int_limits {
+	MAX_MINUS_2 = 0x7ffffffd,
+	MAX_MINUS_1,
+	MAX,
+	/* TODO: expect: overflow in enumeration values: MIN */
+	MIN
+};
+
 TODO: "Add example code that triggers the above message." /* expect: 249 */
 TODO: "Add example code that almost triggers the above message."
Index: src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_048.exp
diff -u src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_048.exp:1.2 src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_048.exp:1.3
--- src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_048.exp:1.2	Sun Mar 21 20:44:59 2021
+++ src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_048.exp	Fri Apr  8 21:29:29 2022
@@ -1 +1 @@
-msg_048.c(6): error: syntax error ':' [249]
+msg_048.c(23): error: syntax error ':' [249]
Index: src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_069.c
diff -u src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_069.c:1.2 src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_069.c:1.3
--- src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_069.c:1.2	Sun Feb 21 09:07:58 2021
+++ src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_069.c	Fri Apr  8 21:29:29 2022
@@ -1,7 +1,12 @@
-/*	$NetBSD: msg_069.c,v 1.2 2021/02/21 09:07:58 rillig Exp $	*/
+/*	$NetBSD: msg_069.c,v 1.3 2022/04/08 21:29:29 rillig Exp $	*/
 # 3 "msg_069.c"
 
 // Test for message: inappropriate qualifiers with 'void' [69]
 
-TODO: "Add example code that triggers the above message." /* expect: 249 */
-TODO: "Add example code that almost triggers the above message."
+/* expect+2: error: void type for 'const_void' [19] */
+/* expect+1: warning: inappropriate qualifiers with 'void' */
+const void const_void;
+
+/* expect+2: error: void type for 'volatile_void' [19] */
+/* expect+1: warning: inappropriate qualifiers with 'void' */
+volatile void volatile_void;
Index: src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_069.exp
diff -u src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_069.exp:1.2 src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_069.exp:1.3
--- src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_069.exp:1.2	Sun Mar 21 20:44:59 2021
+++ src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_069.exp	Fri Apr  8 21:29:29 2022
@@ -1 +1,4 @@
-msg_069.c(6): error: syntax error ':' [249]
+msg_069.c(8): error: void type for 'const_void' [19]
+msg_069.c(8): warning: inappropriate qualifiers with 'void' [69]
+msg_069.c(12): error: void type for 'volatile_void' [19]
+msg_069.c(12): warning: inappropriate qualifiers with 'void' [69]
Index: src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_070.c
diff -u src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_070.c:1.2 src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_070.c:1.3
--- src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_070.c:1.2	Sun Feb 21 09:07:58 2021
+++ src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_070.c	Fri Apr  8 21:29:29 2022
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
-/*	$NetBSD: msg_070.c,v 1.2 2021/02/21 09:07:58 rillig Exp $	*/
+/*	$NetBSD: msg_070.c,v 1.3 2022/04/08 21:29:29 rillig Exp $	*/
 # 3 "msg_070.c"
 
 // Test for message: %soperand of '%s' is unsigned in ANSI C [70]
+/* This message is not used. */
 
-TODO: "Add example code that triggers the above message." /* expect: 249 */
-TODO: "Add example code that almost triggers the above message."
+int var;

Index: src/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/err.c
diff -u src/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/err.c:1.158 src/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/err.c:1.159
--- src/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/err.c:1.158	Tue Apr  5 23:13:56 2022
+++ src/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/err.c	Fri Apr  8 21:29:29 2022
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/*	$NetBSD: err.c,v 1.158 2022/04/05 23:13:56 rillig Exp $	*/
+/*	$NetBSD: err.c,v 1.159 2022/04/08 21:29:29 rillig Exp $	*/
 
 /*
  * Copyright (c) 1994, 1995 Jochen Pohl
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
 
 #include <sys/cdefs.h>
 #if defined(__RCSID) && !defined(lint)
-__RCSID("$NetBSD: err.c,v 1.158 2022/04/05 23:13:56 rillig Exp $");
+__RCSID("$NetBSD: err.c,v 1.159 2022/04/08 21:29:29 rillig Exp $");
 #endif
 
 #include <sys/types.h>
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ const char *const msgs[] = {
 	"cannot return incomplete type",			      /* 67 */
 	"typedef already qualified with '%s'",			      /* 68 */
 	"inappropriate qualifiers with 'void'",			      /* 69 */
-	"%soperand of '%s' is unsigned in ANSI C",		      /* 70 */
+	"",			/* unused */			      /* 70 */
 	"too many characters in character constant",		      /* 71 */
 	"typedef declares no type name",			      /* 72 */
 	"empty character constant",				      /* 73 */

Reply via email to