Valery Ushakov <u...@stderr.spb.ru> wrote: > I think that information *must* be there, as that's *the* place where > the names are (un)parsed. I'm not sure whether this information has > to be duplicated as-is in chflags(1), or whether chflags(1) can have a > less verbose version.
Perhaps a simple See stat_flags(3) for a more detailed description of the meaning of these flags. or something like that? -Jan
