Valery Ushakov <> wrote:

> I think that information *must* be there, as that's *the* place where
> the names are (un)parsed.  I'm not sure whether this information has
> to be duplicated as-is in chflags(1), or whether chflags(1) can have a
> less verbose version.

Perhaps a simple

See stat_flags(3) for a more detailed description of
the meaning of these flags.

or something like that?


Reply via email to