Martin, On Thu, Oct 05, 2023 at 11:42:03AM +0200, Martin Husemann wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 05, 2023 at 11:36:23AM +0200, Martin Husemann wrote: > > No, I was confused by the #ifdef maze - it breaks the build for > > non-MULTIPROCESSOR kernels only, and I am not actually sure what "use" > > gcc sees for the "nlocks" variable at all in that case. > > Scratch that too, I'll get coffee. > > Andrew, should we make the non-MULTIPROCESSOR variant of > > KERNEL_UNLOCK(all, lwp, ptr) > > set *(ptr) = 0 ? Yes that makes sense and is what I plan to do after work today if nobody beats me to it. MULTIPROCESSOR is long overdue removal from the MI kernel, IMO. Andrew
