On Sat, Apr 05, 2025 at 10:01:37PM +1100, Nat Sloss wrote: > Following advice and following the spirit of my intentions adding nop in the > switch i added nops before "rte" in locore.s in sys/mac68k as opposed to > m68k/swicher.
This makes no sense to me (but I can only guess how the exact bug works). My naive guess would be that *any* instruction after a f-line instruction would do, and whenever we do something in the kernel at the critical point we are safe anyway. I would *guess* that placing the additional NOPs in userland only should be enough. Martin
