Module Name:    src
Committed By:   rillig
Date:           Sat Jan  2 16:12:39 UTC 2021

Modified Files:
        src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1: msg_035.c msg_035.exp

Log Message:
lint: fix and document test for illegal bit-fields

The _Complex bit-field should have been commented out.


To generate a diff of this commit:
cvs rdiff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_035.c \
    src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_035.exp

Please note that diffs are not public domain; they are subject to the
copyright notices on the relevant files.

Modified files:

Index: src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_035.c
diff -u src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_035.c:1.2 src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_035.c:1.3
--- src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_035.c:1.2	Sat Jan  2 15:55:54 2021
+++ src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_035.c	Sat Jan  2 16:12:39 2021
@@ -1,8 +1,17 @@
-/*	$NetBSD: msg_035.c,v 1.2 2021/01/02 15:55:54 rillig Exp $	*/
+/*	$NetBSD: msg_035.c,v 1.3 2021/01/02 16:12:39 rillig Exp $	*/
 # 3 "msg_035.c"
 
 // Test for message: illegal bit-field type [35]
 
+/*
+ * In traditional C, only unsigned int is a portable bit-field type.
+ *
+ * In C89, only int, signed int and unsigned int are allowed (3.5.2.1p7).
+ *
+ * In C99 and C11, only _Bool, signed int and unsigned int are allowed,
+ * plus implementation-defined types (6.7.2.1p5).
+ */
+
 typedef struct {
 	int dummy;
 } example_struct;
@@ -46,7 +55,6 @@ struct example {
 	unsigned int array_flag[4]: 1;
 	example_function function_flag: 1;
 // FIXME: aborts:	_Complex complex_flag: 1;
-	_Complex complex_flag: 1;
 	float _Complex float_complex_flag: 1;
 	double _Complex double_complex_flag: 1;
 	long double _Complex long_double_complex_flag: 1;
Index: src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_035.exp
diff -u src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_035.exp:1.2 src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_035.exp:1.3
--- src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_035.exp:1.2	Sat Jan  2 15:55:54 2021
+++ src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_035.exp	Sat Jan  2 16:12:39 2021
@@ -1,18 +1,18 @@
-msg_035.c(24): warning: illegal bit-field type [35]
-msg_035.c(32): warning: illegal bit-field type [35]
 msg_035.c(33): warning: illegal bit-field type [35]
-msg_035.c(34): warning: illegal bit-field type [35]
-msg_035.c(35): warning: illegal bit-field type [35]
-msg_035.c(38): warning: illegal bit-field type [35]
-msg_035.c(39): warning: illegal bit-field type [35]
-msg_035.c(40): warning: illegal bit-field type [35]
-msg_035.c(41): void type for void_flag [19]
-msg_035.c(41): zero size bit-field [37]
+msg_035.c(41): warning: illegal bit-field type [35]
 msg_035.c(42): warning: illegal bit-field type [35]
 msg_035.c(43): warning: illegal bit-field type [35]
-msg_035.c(45): warning: illegal bit-field type [35]
-msg_035.c(46): warning: illegal bit-field type [35]
+msg_035.c(44): warning: illegal bit-field type [35]
 msg_035.c(47): warning: illegal bit-field type [35]
+msg_035.c(48): warning: illegal bit-field type [35]
 msg_035.c(49): warning: illegal bit-field type [35]
-msg_035.c(50): warning: illegal bit-field type [35]
+msg_035.c(50): void type for void_flag [19]
+msg_035.c(50): zero size bit-field [37]
 msg_035.c(51): warning: illegal bit-field type [35]
+msg_035.c(52): warning: illegal bit-field type [35]
+msg_035.c(54): warning: illegal bit-field type [35]
+msg_035.c(55): warning: illegal bit-field type [35]
+msg_035.c(56): warning: illegal bit-field type [35]
+msg_035.c(58): warning: illegal bit-field type [35]
+msg_035.c(59): warning: illegal bit-field type [35]
+msg_035.c(60): warning: illegal bit-field type [35]

Reply via email to