Module Name: src
Committed By: sborrill
Date: Fri Nov 18 21:35:21 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/gnu/dist/gcc4/gcc [netbsd-5]: version.c
src/gnu/dist/gcc4/gcc/config/arm [netbsd-5]: arm.md
Log Message:
Pull up the following revisions(s) (requested by is in ticket #1689):
gnu/dist/gcc4/gcc/version.c: revision 1.19
gnu/dist/gcc4/gcc/config/arm/arm.md: revision 1.1.1.2-1.2
Remove pattern for arith_adjacentmem in arm.md, thus fixing
PR toolchain/45576 at a very small run-time cost.
To generate a diff of this commit:
cvs rdiff -u -r1.16.10.1 -r1.16.10.2 src/gnu/dist/gcc4/gcc/version.c
cvs rdiff -u -r1.1.1.2 -r1.1.1.2.24.1 src/gnu/dist/gcc4/gcc/config/arm/arm.md
Please note that diffs are not public domain; they are subject to the
copyright notices on the relevant files.
Modified files:
Index: src/gnu/dist/gcc4/gcc/version.c
diff -u src/gnu/dist/gcc4/gcc/version.c:1.16.10.1 src/gnu/dist/gcc4/gcc/version.c:1.16.10.2
--- src/gnu/dist/gcc4/gcc/version.c:1.16.10.1 Sat Nov 22 05:17:03 2008
+++ src/gnu/dist/gcc4/gcc/version.c Fri Nov 18 21:35:21 2011
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
in parentheses. You may also wish to include a number indicating
the revision of your modified compiler. */
-#define VERSUFFIX " (NetBSD nb2 20081120)"
+#define VERSUFFIX " (NetBSD nb3 20111107)"
/* This is the location of the online document giving instructions for
reporting bugs. If you distribute a modified version of GCC,
Index: src/gnu/dist/gcc4/gcc/config/arm/arm.md
diff -u src/gnu/dist/gcc4/gcc/config/arm/arm.md:1.1.1.2 src/gnu/dist/gcc4/gcc/config/arm/arm.md:1.1.1.2.24.1
--- src/gnu/dist/gcc4/gcc/config/arm/arm.md:1.1.1.2 Sat Oct 21 23:02:40 2006
+++ src/gnu/dist/gcc4/gcc/config/arm/arm.md Fri Nov 18 21:35:21 2011
@@ -9338,109 +9338,13 @@
(set_attr "length" "4,8,8")]
)
-(define_insn "*arith_adjacentmem"
- [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "s_register_operand" "=r")
- (match_operator:SI 1 "shiftable_operator"
- [(match_operand:SI 2 "memory_operand" "m")
- (match_operand:SI 3 "memory_operand" "m")]))
- (clobber (match_scratch:SI 4 "=r"))]
- "TARGET_ARM && adjacent_mem_locations (operands[2], operands[3])"
- "*
- {
- rtx ldm[3];
- rtx arith[4];
- rtx base_reg;
- HOST_WIDE_INT val1 = 0, val2 = 0;
-
- if (REGNO (operands[0]) > REGNO (operands[4]))
- {
- ldm[1] = operands[4];
- ldm[2] = operands[0];
- }
- else
- {
- ldm[1] = operands[0];
- ldm[2] = operands[4];
- }
-
- base_reg = XEXP (operands[2], 0);
-
- if (!REG_P (base_reg))
- {
- val1 = INTVAL (XEXP (base_reg, 1));
- base_reg = XEXP (base_reg, 0);
- }
-
- if (!REG_P (XEXP (operands[3], 0)))
- val2 = INTVAL (XEXP (XEXP (operands[3], 0), 1));
-
- arith[0] = operands[0];
- arith[3] = operands[1];
-
- if (val1 < val2)
- {
- arith[1] = ldm[1];
- arith[2] = ldm[2];
- }
- else
- {
- arith[1] = ldm[2];
- arith[2] = ldm[1];
- }
-
- ldm[0] = base_reg;
- if (val1 !=0 && val2 != 0)
- {
- rtx ops[3];
- if (val1 == 4 || val2 == 4)
- /* Other val must be 8, since we know they are adjacent and neither
- is zero. */
- output_asm_insn (\"ldm%?ib\\t%0, {%1, %2}\", ldm);
- else if (const_ok_for_arm (val1) || const_ok_for_arm (-val1))
- {
- ldm[0] = ops[0] = operands[4];
- ops[1] = base_reg;
- ops[2] = GEN_INT (val1);
- output_add_immediate (ops);
- if (val1 < val2)
- output_asm_insn (\"ldm%?ia\\t%0, {%1, %2}\", ldm);
- else
- output_asm_insn (\"ldm%?da\\t%0, {%1, %2}\", ldm);
- }
- else
- {
- /* Offset is out of range for a single add, so use two ldr. */
- ops[0] = ldm[1];
- ops[1] = base_reg;
- ops[2] = GEN_INT (val1);
- output_asm_insn (\"ldr%?\\t%0, [%1, %2]\", ops);
- ops[0] = ldm[2];
- ops[2] = GEN_INT (val2);
- output_asm_insn (\"ldr%?\\t%0, [%1, %2]\", ops);
- }
- }
- else if (val1 != 0)
- {
- if (val1 < val2)
- output_asm_insn (\"ldm%?da\\t%0, {%1, %2}\", ldm);
- else
- output_asm_insn (\"ldm%?ia\\t%0, {%1, %2}\", ldm);
- }
- else
- {
- if (val1 < val2)
- output_asm_insn (\"ldm%?ia\\t%0, {%1, %2}\", ldm);
- else
- output_asm_insn (\"ldm%?da\\t%0, {%1, %2}\", ldm);
- }
- output_asm_insn (\"%I3%?\\t%0, %1, %2\", arith);
- return \"\";
- }"
- [(set_attr "length" "12")
- (set_attr "predicable" "yes")
- (set_attr "type" "load1")]
-)
+;-----
+;arith_adjacentmem removed as a quick fix, suggested by rearnsha@
+;broken at least in gcc 4.1.3 - 4.4
+;known fixed in 4.5.3 (is@)
+;known fixed in post-4.6 trunk (rearnsha@)
+;-----
; This pattern is never tried by combine, so do it as a peephole
