On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 03:09:43AM -0600, Henning Brauer wrote: > CVSROOT: /cvs > Module name: src > Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008/09/12 03:09:43 > > Modified files: > share/man/man4 : pflow.4 > > Log message: > revert last unauthorized commit. > I reAlly doN't ThiNk thAt ranDomLy capiTaliZing chAractErs iN woRdS mAkes > tHeM loOk MoRe ImpoRtaNt eVeN iF cIScO tHinKs sO
i'm not sure i like this, for a number of reasons: - googling for netflow generally gets me hits on "NetFlow" - if you invent it, you get to call it what you want. by that i mean, if that's its name, then that's its name. - (importantly for me) arbitrary capitalisation in proprietary names, protocols, products, etc. helps the reader know it's a "product" (for want of a better word). so if we talk about netflows, we could be talking about network flows (in general), but NetFlow is the protocol (or whatever). i think it should stay NetFlow. we do this for lots of other things. jmc
