Stuart Henderson(s...@spacehopper.org) on 2015.12.23 22:37:59 +0000: > On 2015/12/23 14:29, Michael McConville wrote: > > CVSROOT: /cvs > > Module name: www > > Changes by: m...@cvs.openbsd.org 2015/12/23 14:29:03 > > > > Modified files: > > faq : faq6.html > > > > Log message: > > Update discussion of ntpd now that it's enabled by default, and tweak > > the wording a little. From TJ, lightly modified by me. > > > > Since we don't have ntp_adjtime(2) and ntp.org ntpd doesn't support > adjfreq, should we get rid of the part suggesting that ntp.org is > going to be more precise? > > | If you really need microsecond precision more than the <a href= > | "http://openntpd.org/features.html";>benefits</a> of > | OpenNTPD, feel free to use ntp.org's daemon, as it will remain available > | through ports and packages.
i think ever since we have adjfreq() this has been incorrect, so yes, remove it.
