Ingo Schwarze wrote: > No. All the options except -m agree both syntactically and > semantically. Basically, it's just one utility, and the command > names mandoc(1), apropos(1), and whatis(1) are obsolete (though i > have no intention to remove them, that would just hurt people's > finger memory for no gain).
oh, ok. i still use mandoc by hand a lot, but maybe i will start using man more. i didn't look closely enough to see how much overlap there was.
