Thanks. Kind of a picky failure. Funny things happen with indefinites. I found it as I was thinking about the idea of inplace updates with scalar primitives. My concern was to see which ones could fail part-way through processing the verb. Wouldn't want a verb to update part of an array when it encounters a failure leaving the noun partially updated. That is one of the nice things about the way J handles arrays and errors. It either updates the whole noun result or it is left unchanged.
On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 9:10 PM, Marshall Lochbaum <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes. Complex gcd checks that neither of the inputs are infinite but does > not test for NaN. A pretty easy fix. > > Marshall > > On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 04:07:42PM -0600, Don Guinn wrote: > > The following statement hangs: > > > > +.~1 2 1j_. 3 > > > > Hangs in j64_804, j64_805 and J6 32 bit under Windows 10 > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
